ANSWER WRITING GROUP (AWG) 2019
ForumIAS AWG 2019 Entrance Exam will be held on 8th June | 9 AM.   CLICK HERE to know more and apply.

COMPREHENSIVE GUIDANCE PROGRAM 2020
ForumIAS CGP 2020 Program commences from June 20th, 2019. CLICK HERE to know more and apply. Or email us on admissions@forumias.academy to know more

Ethics+ Batch 2 for CSE 2019
Starts 12th June, 2019Register Here

What are the arguments against banning prostitution ?

Topic created · 2 Posts · 539 Views
  • Should prostitution be legalized or banned..?..if it is legalized, who should regulate it..?
    One argument says that it should be banned because a person does not have the absolute liberty right over their body. The act of exchanging money for sex is therefore immoral. But this would give rise to a paternalistic state.
    In contrast, libertarian views opine that a person has absolute rights over his/her body and can pursue any profession as long as it does not harm the right of other persons to do the same.
    So to declare prostitution illegal would mean a woman has no absolute rights over her body.
    This would indicate that a court can interfere in other bodily decisions of an individual....if it can be justified..
    For example, sex selective abortion is prohibited under pcpndt act 1994.

    Qn: Does the state have any right over a person's bodily rights..? If yes, then to what extent can a state regulate a person's rights..?..If no, then can bodily freedom/rights be used to for example, to allow voluntary cannibalism or active euthanasia..?

  • Some lines along which you could think is :

    1. Banning it on legal grounds than one has not absolute rights over his or her body, has wider ramifications - such as organ donation can be made compulsory
    2. The State is not the best determinant of what constitutes public morality . It has a poor track record in doing that, and it has always been conservative , much behind times in such matters.
    3. In the Indian context, this constitutes a danger to public morality when solicited in public - not in private. The Supreme Court verdict on Right to Privacy as a Fundamental right makes it difficult to declare it illegal.